In a stunning turn of events, an indictment against former President Donald Trump emerged before the grand jury even cast their votes. The court, amidst panic and chaos, took the unprecedented step of removing the indictment. This jaw-dropping incident has left many wondering about the potential ramifications and the impact it may have on the legal landscape.
RIGGED: Trump Indicted BEFORE Grand Jury Even VOTES?! Court DELETES Indictment in PANIC and CHAOS
Introduction:
In a shocking turn of events, Fulton County, GA, released Donald Trump’s indictment report on their website before the grand jury had even voted on it. This scandalous revelation has raised serious questions about the impartiality and fairness of the legal process. Investigative journalist Benny Johnson, in his gripping video, highlights the inconsistencies and questionable practices surrounding this case. Let’s delve into the details and unravel this story of potential corruption and chaos.
- Fulton County’s Premature Indictment Release:
- The release of Trump’s indictment report on the Fulton County website before the grand jury’s vote has left many astounded.
- This questionable action raises concerns about transparency and the integrity of the legal proceedings.
- The premature release suggests a predetermined outcome and an unjust manipulation of the grand jury process.
- Tainted Grand Jury:
- The fact that the grand jury knew the charges against Trump before they even cast their votes raises eyebrows.
- This raises questions about the fairness and objectivity of the grand jury’s decision-making process.
- Jack Frostovic’s claim about the charges being posted and then removed from the docket adds to the confusion and uncertainty surrounding this case.
- The whole affair reeks of impropriety and suggests a potential cover-up.
- Revealing Indictment Details:
- The document briefly posted on the Georgia Court website stated that Trump would be indicted under the RICO (Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations) statute.
- Such a serious charge carries significant implications, and its premature revelation casts doubt on the legitimacy of the entire process.
- The public release of these details without a proper vote by the grand jury compromises the integrity of the trial.
- Witnesses and Allegations:
- Atlanta journalist George Chidi’s involvement in this case as a witness for the grand jury raises concerns about a potential conflict of interest.
- The inclusion of accusations of forged documents in the charges against Trump adds another layer of complexity to this already convoluted case.
- These serious allegations, combined with the questionable conduct of the government, require a thorough investigation and objective scrutiny.
- Outrageous Conduct and Motion to Dismiss:
- The government’s outrageous conduct throughout this process could give rise to a motion to dismiss the case altogether.
- The premature release of the indictment, the potential manipulation of the grand jury, and the biased grand jury foreperson all contribute to a potential violation of constitutional due process.
- It is imperative that Trump’s defense team pursue every legal avenue available to ensure a fair trial and protect his constitutional rights.
Conclusion:
The revelation that Donald Trump was indicted before the grand jury voted has sent shockwaves through the legal community and the public at large. This disturbing incident raises serious questions about the fairness, transparency, and integrity of the legal process. Fulton County’s premature release of the indictment, combined with the potential bias of the grand jury, undermines the foundation of justice. It is crucial that this matter is thoroughly investigated to restore public faith in the legal system. The stakes are high, and the truth must prevail to ensure a fair trial and protect the principles enshrined in the Constitution. The world is watching as this intricate web of corruption and conspiracy is unraveled before our eyes.
Note: The article contains 514 words.
