OWNED: Dave Portnoy EXPOSES Dishonest Reporter by Recording Their Phone Call

Introduction

In this article, I will discuss a recent incident involving Dave Portnoy, where he made a pre-emptive strike against a Washington Post reporter who was planning to write a hit piece about him. The hit piece was related to Portnoy’s One Bite Pizza Festival and its associated sponsors. We will delve into how Portnoy exposed the reporter’s dishonesty by recording their phone call and how he criticized the state of journalism in the politically correct cancel culture environment. This incident highlights the declining standards of journalism and the need for transparency. Now, let’s dive into the details.

I, Dave Portnoy, made a pre-emptive strike against a Washington Post reporter writing a hit piece about me.

As Dave Portnoy, the founder of Barstool Sports, I found myself in the midst of a potential scandal when I discovered that a reporter from the Washington Post was planning to write a hit piece about me. Rather than wait for the article to be published, I took matters into my own hands and decided to expose the dishonesty of the reporter.

The hit piece was about my One Bite Pizza Festival and its associated sponsors.

The Washington Post reporter had targeted my One Bite Pizza Festival, an event that celebrates the love for pizza. The festival had gained popularity over the years, attracting both pizza lovers and sponsors who saw value in being associated with the event. However, the reporter saw an opportunity to tarnish my reputation and undermine the festival’s success.

The Washington Post reporter reached out to the sponsors, undermining the event.

To further her agenda, the reporter reached out to the sponsors of the One Bite Pizza Festival. Her intention was clear – to gather negative information about me and the event. By contacting the sponsors, she aimed to scare them away and potentially damage the reputation of the festival.

I called out the reporter for calling me misogynistic and racist.

Upon discovering the reporter’s actions, I felt it was necessary to address the accusations made against me. In her email communication, the reporter referred to me as misogynistic and racist, allegations I vehemently disagreed with. I found her labeling to be unfair and misrepresented my character.

The reporter planned to release the article the next day but hadn’t reached out to me yet.

It came to my attention that the reporter was planning to release the hit piece the very next day. What struck me as surprising was the fact that she had not yet reached out to me for my side of the story. This raised concerns about the reporter’s intent, as it seemed she had already made up her mind without giving me a fair chance to defend myself.

I exposed her lie and intention to scare sponsors away.

Not willing to be a victim of biased journalism, I decided to take action. I recorded a phone call with the reporter, exposing her lies and intentions. In the call, she admitted that she had indeed contacted the sponsors with the intention of scaring them away from the event. This revelation shed light on her unethical practices and further validated my concerns about the declining standards of journalism.

I criticized the state of journalism in the politically correct cancel culture environment.

In the aftermath of this incident, I took to social media to publicly criticize the state of journalism in today’s politically correct cancel culture environment. I expressed my disappointment in the lack of integrity and accountability displayed by the reporter and the Washington Post. It is disheartening to see that sensationalism and manipulation of facts have taken precedence over fair and unbiased reporting.

I publicly confronted the Washington Post and the reporter for their actions.

I firmly believe in holding individuals and organizations accountable for their actions. In this case, I publicly confronted both the Washington Post and the reporter for their unethical behavior. By shining a spotlight on their actions, I hoped to bring attention to the need for responsible and honest journalism.

Woodward and Bernstein would be disappointed in the standards of the Washington Post.

As a renowned journalist duo who uncovered the Watergate scandal, Woodward and Bernstein set a high standard for investigative journalism. Looking at the state of affairs in the Washington Post, it is safe to say that they would be disappointed in the declining standards of the newspaper. The incident involving the hit piece on me only further emphasizes the need for journalists to adhere to ethical practices and unbiased reporting.

In conclusion, the incident involving the dishonest reporter and the hit piece on Dave Portnoy exemplifies the declining standards of journalism in today’s politically correct cancel culture environment. Portnoy’s decision to record the phone call and expose the reporter’s unethical practices sheds light on the need for transparency and accountability in the field of journalism. It is high time we reevaluate our expectations from media organizations and demand responsible reporting that upholds the principles of fairness and truth.