Introduction

Hello everyone! I am Carmine Sabia, and today I want to bring your attention to a recent revelation that has the potential to be a game changer in the trial of the century. We all know that trials can be full of twists and turns, but this one takes the cake. Jackie Jack Smith, the special counsel prosecuting Trump, has been caught in a web of lies that could have serious repercussions for the entire case.

Smith’s Failure to Disclose Evidence

In a shocking turn of events, Smith and his team have admitted that they did not provide all the evidence they claimed to have given to the Trump Team. This revelation is deeply troubling and goes against the very principles of justice. According to the Brady rule, which requires full disclosure of evidence to the defense, this failure to provide crucial information undermines the integrity of the trial.

The Missing Surveillance Tapes

One of the most crucial pieces of evidence that Smith and his team failed to disclose were the surveillance tapes from Mar-A-Lago. These tapes could potentially be exculpatory for Trump, as he claims. However, Smith conveniently neglected to hand them over to the defense, raising serious questions about his intentions and credibility.

Smith’s Intentions Questioned

It is not unreasonable to question whether Smith intended to indict Trump from the beginning and simply needed his legal ducks in a row. The failure to disclose evidence, especially evidence that could potentially exonerate the accused, raises doubts about Smith’s integrity and impartiality. It is imperative that we hold our legal representatives to the highest standards and demand transparency and fairness in our justice system.

Exculpatory Evidence Already Given?

Adding fuel to the fire, Bernard Carrick, a key witness in the case, has come forward with a bombshell revelation. Carrick claims that he had already given exculpatory evidence to Smith before Trump was even indicted. This raises even more questions about Smith’s motives and raises the possibility that he might have been withholding evidence to secure a conviction.

My Theory

I have a theory regarding Smith’s motivations and intentions in this case, but I will refrain from sharing it at this time. I want to avoid any potential fact-checking and want to focus on the information that we do have. However, I invite all of you to share your thoughts and opinions in the comments section. Let’s have a healthy discussion about Smith’s actions and whether he truly accomplished his goals.

Conclusion

In conclusion, the recent admission by Jackie Jack Smith that he did not tell the truth in court is a game changer for the trial. This failure to disclose evidence raises serious questions about the integrity of the case and calls into question Smith’s credibility as a prosecutor. We must demand transparency and fairness in our justice system and hold those in positions of power accountable for their actions.

Please remember to like, comment, share, and subscribe to our channel, as your support helps us grow. Let’s keep the conversation going and work towards a more just and transparent legal system.

Thank you for joining me today, and I look forward to hearing your thoughts.