Democrat Gov. DECLARES 2nd Amendment ILLEGAL Due To An “Emergency” | Full-Blown TYRANNY is Here🚨
Introduction
In a shocking move, the Governor of New Mexico, Michelle Lujan Grisham, has suspended the first and second amendments due to what she referred to as an “emergency.” This declaration has sparked outrage and a call for her removal from office. In this article, we will delve into the details of this alarming situation and explore its potential implications for the rights of American citizens.
The Suspension of Constitutional Rights
Governor Lujan Grisham’s declaration that no rights are absolute and that the second amendment is non-existent has ignited a firestorm of controversy. This far-reaching decision is seen by many as an act of tyranny and a direct violation of the Constitution. The sanctity of the second amendment, which guarantees the right to bear arms, has long been a cornerstone of American values.
An Alarming Precedent
One of the major concerns surrounding this suspension is that it could set a dangerous precedent for further infringements on other rights. If a governor can unilaterally suspend a constitutional right, what is to stop them from targeting other amendments? This erosion of rights is seen as a direct threat to the very foundations of American democracy.
Condemnation of Governor Lujan Grisham
Governor Lujan Grisham’s actions have not gone unnoticed or unchallenged. Many individuals and organizations are voicing their strong opposition to her decision, declaring it as both evil and unconstitutional. There is a growing push for her impeachment and even potential imprisonment, as this suspension is viewed as a gross abuse of power.
The Impact on Law-Abiding Citizens
One of the most alarming aspects of this suspension is its disparate impact on law-abiding citizens. While criminals may choose to disregard the governor’s order and continue to possess firearms illegally, law-abiding citizens are left defenseless. This asymmetry highlights the inherent dangers of policies that undermine the second amendment. The very people who are responsible and law-abiding are now vulnerable to potential harm.
A Trial Balloon for Further Suspensions
There is a widespread fear that this suspension of the second amendment may only be the first step in a broader campaign to erode constitutional rights. Some view it as a trial balloon, testing the public’s response and readiness to accept further restrictions. Such actions have serious implications for the future of individual liberties in the United States.
The Government Seizing Property
As the ramifications of this suspension become clearer, concerns are emerging about potential property seizures in the name of an emergency. When rights are suspended, there is a growing fear that the government may exploit the situation to unjustly seize private property. This possibility adds to the overall anxiety about the trajectory of the government’s actions.
Conclusion
The suspension of the second amendment by Governor Lujan Grisham in New Mexico has ignited a fierce debate about the preservation of constitutional rights in times of emergency. The call to remove her from office reflects the gravity of this situation and the need to uphold the principles enshrined in the United States Constitution. It is imperative that the rights of law-abiding citizens are protected and that further encroachments on essential freedoms are vehemently opposed. The preservation of individual liberties is a cornerstone of democracy, and vigilance is necessary to ensure their continued existence.
