Was Durham Afraid to Take on Foreign Intel Agencies Setting Up Trump Associates?

Introduction

The Durham report‚ released on June 21st‚ has brought to light a number of shocking revelations surrounding the 2016 US Presidential election. Many have questioned the role of foreign intelligence agencies in setting up Trump associates‚ and whether former Special Counsel John Durham was afraid to take them on. This article will delve into the details of the report and explore the perspectives of investigative journalists and national security researchers on this controversial topic.

One America News Network (OANN)

Before diving into the report‚ it is important to note that One America News Network (OANN) has been a prominent source of exclusive full-length content related to the Durham investigation. Through their OAN Live App and new social platform called Free Talk‚ OANN has been at the forefront of promoting free speech and avoiding shadowbanning users. OANN is also present on various social media platforms‚ including Facebook‚ Twitter‚ Instagram‚ and KlowdTV.

The Durham Report

The Durham report has revealed a number of startling details regarding the actions of former FBI Director James Comey‚ whose actions related to the 2016 election have been the focus of much scrutiny. The report highlights Comey’s rushed actions and excuses for his actions‚ which have raised serious questions about his integrity and impartiality. Investigative journalist Julie Kelly has argued that Comey should be in jail for his actions‚ which she characterizes as a betrayal of the American people.

Missed Involvement of Joseph Mifsud

Despite the damning evidence against Comey‚ national security researcher John Rosamondo argues that the Durham report has missed the involvement of Joseph Mifsud. According to Rosamondo‚ Mifsud played a central role in the plot to ensnare Trump associate George Papadopoulos‚ and his involvement in the larger scheme to undermine Trump’s candidacy cannot be underestimated. Rosamondo believes that Durham was afraid to take on Mifsud and other foreign intel agencies‚ which May have compromised the integrity of the investigation.

Italian Prime Minister’s Involvement

Papadopoulos himself has claimed that the Italian Prime Minister was involved in the conspiracy against Donald Trump during the 2016 election. According to Papadopoulos‚ the Italian government played a pivotal role in setting up the Trump campaign‚ and he has consistently maintained that he was the victim of a malicious plot designed to discredit him and his associates. While Papadopoulos’s claims have not yet been fully substantiated‚ they certainly raise troubling questions about the involvement of foreign governments in US elections.

Conclusion

The Durham report has shed new light on the extent of foreign intel agencies’ involvement in the 2016 Presidential election. While the report has been praised for highlighting James Comey’s questionable actions‚ some have argued that it does not go far enough in addressing the larger issue of foreign interference. Only time will tell whether Durham was truly afraid to take on these agencies‚ but it is clear that the implications of the report are far-reaching and have the potential to impact future elections as well.